Comments for C# and stuff

Comment on About by Kristoffer Brinch Kjeldby

Kristoffer Brinch Kjeldby — Sun, 01 Jan 2012 21:34:33 +0000

Hi Birgit

I done alot of .net coding and may be able to hello. Maybe you could drop me and email with some details at kristoffer@kjeldby.dk. Sorry for the late reply, I just returned from holiday.

Regards Kristoffer

Comment on About by Kristoffer Brinch Kjeldby

Kristoffer Brinch Kjeldby — Sun, 01 Jan 2012 21:30:18 +0000

Unfortunally the plugin was written at work, so the code is not mine ):

An to be hornest I newer made the plugin 100% generic, so not every detail can customized …

Regards Kristoffer (and Happy New Year).

Comment on About by James

James — Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:08:48 +0000

Hello Kristoffer,
I recently read your post “Faceted search in WordPress” and was wondering if you would make that plugin available to others.

Please let me know.

Comment on About by Birgit

Birgit — Mon, 19 Dec 2011 02:55:42 +0000

Hi Kristoffer, just came across your blog when searching for ‘code for faceted search’ and I noticed that you are .net guy.

I am looking for someone to help design/ impliment faceted search on our web site and I would love to have a chat to you about it.

Kind regards
Birgit Stewart
CareerClothing.com

Comment on Paths in User Controls by Jaqueline

Jaqueline — Sun, 17 Oct 2010 03:51:52 +0000

Awesome! runat=”server” really does something here

Comment on Overflow, checked and unchecked by Kristoffer Brinch Kjeldby

Kristoffer Brinch Kjeldby — Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:46:18 +0000

Hi Chunkit

Yeps – The check happens before the addition.

Regarding optimization I suspects that the compile will not replace a checked operation with an unchecked, when it is explicit written in the code even – if the check is redundant. I have not checked this however. I you want to go into the msil code, you can use the MSIL Disassembler (Ildasm.exe).

Regards Kristoffer

Comment on Overflow, checked and unchecked by chunkit

chunkit — Tue, 03 Aug 2010 02:53:43 +0000

I made a mistake in my previous comment. b < 255 is correct.

Comment on Overflow, checked and unchecked by chunkit

chunkit — Tue, 03 Aug 2010 02:29:45 +0000

The third code should be i < 256 and b < 256.
Depending on what you want, you may want to throw an exception if !(b < 256).

I guess the performance penalty for using checked is that it checks both b++ and i++, but I can't be sure unless I look into the msil code (haven't learnt to do that yet). Perhaps a good compiler will optimize away the checking on integral variables that can be determined at compile-time never to cause an OverflowException.

Comment on Microsoft Team Foundation Server: Moving from Visual Source Safe by Nick Yilmaz

Nick Yilmaz — Sat, 31 Jul 2010 20:22:19 +0000

Is it possible to control version of programs with TFS? For instance, a student submits a source code of project to the teacher and the teacher respond back to student with comment in the program.

Comment on Microsoft Team Foundation Server: Moving from Visual Source Safe by Kristoffer Brinch Kjeldby

Kristoffer Brinch Kjeldby — Wed, 05 May 2010 16:08:54 +0000

Thanks! TFS 2010 is so much easier to handle!